Saturday, December 30, 2017

My top 15 films of 2017: 5-1

Previously, we had numbers 15 to 11 and then numbers 10 to 6 of the best of 2017. Just a quick recap:

15. A Ghost Story
14. Logan
13. The LEGO Batman Movie
12. Free Fire
11. Battle of the Sexes
10. Get Out
9. Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2
8. War for the Planet of the Apes
7. Dunkirk
6. Detroit

So for one last time, here are my top five...


5. T2 Trainspotting

Back in 1996, we chose life. Now, we are doing it again and we've brought the old band back together.
20 years on from stealing a bag full on money and ditching his friends, Mark Renton (Ewan McGregor) has returned to Edinburgh to reunite with them - Spud (Ewen Bremner) and Simon, formerly known as "Sick Boy" (Jonny Lee Miller), who has a business proposal lined up for him. Meanwhile, the psychotic maniac known as Begbie (Robert Carlyle), who Renton double-crossed, has escaped from prison.
20 years is a long time to wait for a sequel and there were a lot of high expectations for this, particularly because of Trainspotting's cult status. The follow-up to Irvine Welsh's original book was Porno, which was set ten years later, and a few years ago there was a draft by screenwriter John Hodge that was sent to everybody. Director Danny Boyle said it was faithful to the book, but did not really translate to the big screen, so the filmmakers went for a more original story; one more personal to Hodge. As I may have mentioned before, Irvine Welsh is not the most cinematic of authors; the only other work of his that has made a successful transition to the screen was Filth.
So, has it worked, waiting this long? Well if they had made it sooner, five or even ten years after the original, there would not have been the same nostalgia that was experienced, not only by the audience but also the filmmakers and actors. Modern-day films, if they are a hit, will get a sequel about two or three years after their release; it is a commercial pressure. Danny Boyle said that was not the case back in the late 90s...Sorry, going back to the question that was asked; of course it has worked. There are many themes addressed in this film, including nostalgia for the past, age and the consequences of getting older, friendship, trust, memories (both good and bad), betrayal, addiction, recovery and redemption. I am sure we can all relate to those in some sort of way.
We see that all the characters have aged sufficiently. They felt young, fearless and invincible in the first film, but a lot can happen in 20 years. This film is a reunion of sorts, seeing what it is these characters have got up to in that time and what is the state-of-play with their current situations, similarly with the actors who play them. Renton has swapped drugs for running, but he soon comes to the realisation that his life is not so rosy and the last time he was truly content was 20 years ago. He returns to Edinburgh with a lot of baggage after being diagnosed for ACS and feeling a certain amount of guilt for stealing that money. He is trying to rebuild old bridges with those he once called friends and also his own family; even since he left his mum has passed away. He is "a tourist in [his] own youth". Spud has continued to struggle with addiction and is possibly the worse for wear of all the characters as we are reacquainted with them. But then he becomes the centre of the film, using his nostalgia and memories as creative inspiration; he needs a purpose. Ewen Bremner does give the best performance in this film. I loved the little Raging Bull tribute when he tries going to a boxing gym for the first time. During his time in prison, Begbie has been estranged from his son and wants him to follow his example of crime and violence, rather than hotel management. Apart from that all he wants to do is kill Renton. Simon, who has still got his standout blonde hair, is unsuccessfully running a pub but also still living on the edge, notably attempting to blackmail well-respected members of society. And his big masterplan involves fraudulently applying for a business development loan from the European Union. As for other characters, remember Diane (Kelly MacDonald)? She is now a lawyer. And Mikey Forrester (Irvine Welsh) has also moved up in the world. We're also introduced to new ones, particularly Simon's Bulgarian girlfriend Veronika (Anjela Nadyalkova).
I like to think that Danny Boyle is the only one who has not changed slightly in those 20 years (apart from the fact that he won an Oscar for directing Slumdog Millionaire and won the hearts of the nation with the opening ceremony to the London 2012 Olympics). Only he could have brought all this together and allowed the cast to find these characters for themselves, giving them the occasional hint along the way. It certainly looks as if the conflict that once existed between him and Ewan McGregor is over, just because Boyle decided to go for Leonardo DiCaprio for The Beach instead of McGregor who had been in all of his previous feature films.
So, the title. Why 'T2'? Danny Boyle said he wanted to call it that if that would have been allowed by James Cameron as 'T2' was, and still is, the common abbreviation of Terminator 2: Judgment Day. However, Terminator 2 is not legally called that. Well the cast believe that the name they went with would have been chosen by the characters, particularly to annoy Cameron. That's fine by me.
...Oh, and the soundtrack is particularly good (see, I didn't forget one of the key elements to the first film), featuring Queen, Blondie, Wolf Alice, Young Fathers, Underworld, Frankie Goes To Hollywood and a remix of Lust For Life.


4. Blade Runner 2049

Caution – review may contain spoilers…and possibly a unicorn…or maybe not (it would if we were talking about the original)…
The one film I was most concerned about this year. Why make a sequel to one of the greatest science-fiction films ever made? Many believe that film is close to perfect. How can you come close to matching perfection? What is “more human than human”?
Once again set in a futuristic Los Angeles, 30 years after the events of Blade Runner, the Tyrell Corporation has gone bankrupt and been bought by Niander Wallace (Jared Leto), who is manufacturing replicants - bioengineered androids. Meanwhile, Officer K (Ryan Gosling) is one of the new generation of blade runners who hunt down and "retire" replicants. He discovers a long-buried secret which has huge implications for mankind and his search then leads him to the man who was in his shoes 30 years before - Rick Deckard (Harrison Ford).
I mentioned before that Ben Wheatley has been a regular contributor to my countdowns over the last few years. Another is Canadian director Denis Villeneuve. In 2013, he gave us Prisoners (which only just missed out on my top 10 that year, but received an honourable mention); 2015, Sicario; last year, Arrival. This is certainly his most ambitious film yet. He is obviously a fan of Blade Runner, to the extent that there was a Q&A that he took part in with Ridley Scott and they had a little disagreement as to whether or not Deckard was really a replicant. In fact, Harrison Ford distanced himself from that film and Ridley Scott because he [Ford] always believed that Deckard was human. Speaking of which, if you are going to watch Blade Runner before Blade Runner 2049 make sure it is the 'Final Cut' you watch...the one with the unicorn. I have mentioned previously going to see that version at the Tyneside Cinema just over two years ago; one of my favourite movie-going experiences and the Tyneside has quickly become my favourite cinema.
Anyway, back to reality, you could try to watch 2049 as a stand-alone piece and it would still work, but there are many concepts you will only fully comprehend if you have seen the original, especially in the final third. As a fan of the original, I gave a sigh of relief at the end. All the key themes from Blade Runner, including what it means to be human, can artificial intelligence ever evolve into something more and memories, had something new done to them. It is just shy of three hours long and when I saw it in a cinema it felt long. So it is a film that takes its time to tell its story as well as recap the original. In terms of its two main stars, they are both very good; Gosling is well-restrained (more so than some of his previous, memorable roles) and Ford is very sincere in his old age.

It is a visual masterpiece, thanks to cinematographer Roger Deakins. You can easily lose yourself in the vast world that has been created; it is breath-taking. The use of colour stands out: the bleak grey cities and rusty oranges/browns. The world that has been created looks endless. If you keep wandering through the fog, you have no idea what you will find next. The score for the original was an iconic piece from Greek composer Vangelis, combining electronic synth with noir jazz. This one began with Jóhann Jóhannsson as its composer, a previous collaborator with Villeneuve, before he left and was replaced by Benjamin Wallfisch and Hans Zimmer. Even that harks back to the original, if not a bit louder. It certainly matched the mood of the film at times, whether it was an action set piece, key dialogue between characters, establishing shot, etc.
It still beggars belief that this film was a commercial flop in the US. Some people have highlighted a fault with the film’s gender politics. With the possible exceptions of Robin Wright and Sylvia Hoeks, most of the female characters are treated like sex objects. Ryan Gosling has a virtual girlfriend that he has created and determined her setting depending on his mood and there are large naked statues. I understand these arguments and, yes, the plot is driven primarily by the male characters. But that is not the worst thing this film could have done. It could have destroyed all the great memories of the original Blade Runner, but thankfully it did not.
My one criticism - the dialogue in places was a bit soft. It will not last in time like the immortal "tears in rain" speech that Roy Batty (Rutger Hauer) gave in the original.



3. The Disaster Artist

Did I ever doubt this film would not be good? "I did naaaht!...Oh, hi Mark." In fact, it exceeded my expectations.
The Disaster Artist is a dramedy looking back at the making of what is considered to be “the Citizen Kane of bad films” – The Room. Greg Sestero (Dave Franco) wants to become an actor, but is struggling to emote and feels insecure. But then he sees the unforgettable enigma that is Tommy Wiseau (James Franco). The two of them move to Los Angeles to further pursue acting careers, fail and therefore decide to make their own film. It also accounts for the troubles making it and the aftermath.
The film is based on the book of the same name by Greg Sestero and Tom Bissell, adapted for the screen by Scott Neustadter and Michael H. Weber. It accounts for Sestero’s experiences, not just of making The Room but also his friendship with Tommy Wiseau. They are two people with a similar dream, to be famous. The rights were published back in 2014 by Seth Rogan’s Point Grey Pictures and it was then announced that James Franco would direct.
I have never properly watched The Room, but I have seen numerous internet critics like the Nostalgia Critic and CinemaSins dissect it. I am aware of it having a cult following, in the same way as The Rocky Horror Picture Show (the midnight screenings and the audience participation) or Ed Wood movies. And that is The Disaster Artist’s closest comparison for many – Tim Burton’s Ed Wood (Johnny Depp plays the worst director of all time, at the time of making Plan 9 from Outer Space). Tommy Wiseau believes he is making a film worthy of Tennessee Williams, but it is in fact hillarious cinematic garbage. The writing is bad; the direction is bad; the acting is bad. And it is largely down to him. The film cost allegedly $6 million but only grossed $1800, and Wiseau supposedly paid to keep it in theatres so it would be eligible for the Academy Awards.
The real-life Tommy Wiseau was hoping to be portrayed by Johnny Depp, before agreeing on James Franco. In fact there is a moment in the film where Tommy wants Depp to play the role of Mark in The Room if not Greg. Anyway, Franco is amazing as this strange man who we never really learn anything about. Where is he from; how old is he and where is the money coming from to finance this film? Supposedly he is from New Orleans, but his voice is from another planet; his is the same age as Greg, despite looking twice as old, and money is no object. He wants brilliance and to play the hero, but is told by one acting coach that he should only stick to villains or monsters like Frankenstein or Dracula. He has a “malevolent presence” and we see that later on when he is being horrible to one of his co-stars.  He is a complete arse towards the others making the film at times; he compares himself to Stanley Kubrick and Alfred Hitchcock.
This is without doubt Franco’s best performance since 127 Hours. One of my favourite scenes is when we are introduced to Tommy at the drama school; he is giving this performance of what we assume is meant to be Stanley from A Streetcar Named Desire, riving on the floor and continuously yelling “Stella!” You watch it and you are just like “Wow! This is terrible and yet amazing at the same time.” Supposedly Franco stayed in character whilst in the director’s chair.
And then there is Dave Franco as Greg. He is in awe of Tommy's fearlessness, making comparisons to James Dean and wants to learn from him. At times he wants to live his own life, such as move in with his girlfriend and maybe branch out his acting, but then he remembers he made a pact to Tommy. This is the first Dave Franco performance I have actually enjoyed and taken seriously. Another fun performance, I thought, was Seth Rogan as Sandy Schklair, the script supervisor, who must have been the most patient man in the world during the filming of the actual film. Other notable performances include Alison Brie, Josh Hutcherson, Zac Efron, Sharon Stone and Bob Odenkirk. There are also numerous cameos – Kevin Smith, J. J. Abrams, Judd Apatow, Kristen Bell, Keegan-Michael Key and Bryan Cranston, who offers Greg the opportunity of an appearance in Malcolm in the Middle.
New York Magazine summed this film up perfectly – “A tribute to those who dream so big and fail so spectacularly that they actually triumph.” The Tyneside Cinema was showing a double-bill screening of this and The Room together (sadly I was late to the party; they quickly sold out). And that is the main thing you will get from this film – you will want to go and watch The Room. You can finally tick it off your movie bucket-list.


2. Baby Driver

Before I go on with this review, let me address the elephant in the corner. There is one member of this film’s cast who has been in the news in the last couple of months regarding allegations of sexual harassment. This review will not deny or question the authenticity of these accusations; it is just concentrating on the film Baby Driver. All I will say is there is one quote in particular that this cast member says and at the time it was considered crude and many audience members sniggered at it, but now that moment feels more awkward. Please do not judge me on including this film.
Now, on with the review. Let’s take one of Britain’s top filmmakers, Edgar Wright, send him stateside and let him loose with an idea he has had for years. You could not have car chase sequences like these ones on the streets of London. It can only work in the US. The last film he made on the other side of the Atlantic was the underrated-at-the-time-but-now-cult-hit Scott Pilgrim vs The World. However, here is his first solo outing as a writer and director. Just don't be put off the title.
'Baby' (Ansel Elgort) is a talented getaway driver working for a crime boss known as 'Doc' (Kevin Spacey). What is different about Baby is that he has permanent tinnitus (ever since a car accident in his childhood) and he blocks it out using music, which can heighten his focus and reflexes and provide the perfect soundtrack for a heist/getaway. Before he is able to have an ordinary life, he must help a group of bank robbers, including impulsive gunslinger 'Bats' (Jamie Foxx), scandalous 'Darling' (Eiza González) and former Wall Street trader 'Buddy' (Jon Hamm).
Wright originally came up with the idea twenty-two years ago when he was living in North London, listening to Bellbottoms by The Jon Spencer Blues Explosion and thinking that it would make a great car-chase song. There is also the influence of great car movies (or films with significant car scenes in them) such as Bullitt, The French Connection (featuring the greatest car chase ever in film), the original Italian Job, Vanishing Point, Smokey and the Bandit, The Driver, The Blues Brothers etc.(just remember this is Edgar Wright we are talking about; think about all those films that Shaun of the Dead and Hot Fuzz were influenced by). It is that combination of visuals - high speeds, sharp cornering, handbrake turns - and sounds – loud revving engines and tortured tyre squealing. Then there is the heist element to it, inspired by the likes of The Getaway, Thunderbold and Lightfoot, Heat and Point Break (a film very close to Edgar Wright's heart (if you didn't know that already)).
With regards to the action sequences, the music motivates what is happening, very similar to the fight in the pub scene from Shaun of the Dead when they are playing Don't Stop Me Now. This was also the case in Scott Pilgrim and going back as far as Spaced. A good example in this film is when Baby won't let Bats and his gang out of the car for their heist until he reaches the right point in the track he is listening to. That scene also provided a good laugh particularly the fact that Bats wanted masks like Michael Myers from Halloween (I'll let you work out what the other guy has bought):
  • Eddie (Flea): Doc said Michael Myers!
  • JD (Lanny Joon): This IS Mike Myers.
  • Bats: It should be the Halloween mask.
  • JD: This is a Halloween mask!
  • Bats: No, the killer dude from Halloween.
  • JD: Oh, you mean Jason.
  • Eddie and Bats: No!
The music and action dominate the set-pieces and so there is very little dialogue to them, like the car chase in Bullitt (although you would not have been able to hear a word from Steve McQueen over the sound of that Ford Mustang). The stunts were coordinated by Darrin Prescott who also worked as a stunt driver on the car chase through the streets of Moscow in The Bourne Supremacy. The Fast & Furious franchise wished they could have stunts like these.
These aren't just a random selection of tracks. A lot of thought must have gone into this selection, finding ones that would work best in a car film. Wright said he would not write a scene until he found the right track, so the writing accompanies it. So the choice of songs dictates the scenes; the action sequences; the dialogue to some extent; the camerawork; the editing. It is almost like a musical; yep, I am comparing Baby Driver to La La Land. And it is also good that Edgar Wright did pick a variety of tracks, some that I was unfamiliar with, rather than just the driving anthems everyone expects to hear. I already mentioned Bellbottoms, but here are some more notable inclusions:
  • Hocus Pocus - Focus
  • Tequila - Button Down Brass
  • Radar Love - Golden Earring
  • Brighton Rock - Queen
  • Neat Neat Neat - The Damned
  • Nowhere To Run - Martha & The Vandellas
  • The Edge - David McCallum
  • Harlem Shuffle – Bob & Earl
  • Egyptian Reggae – Jonathan Richman & The Modern Lovers
The way he uses the tinnitus is rather interesting too, particularly with the movie beginning with the sound of it playing over the studio logos and it going away when the music begins. We see the film through the eyes of Baby, but also hear it through the ears. It is almost non-stop.
Ansel Elgort does come of age in this film, perfectly depicting a young man with good intentions but has been forced into this life of crime. We see him have chance encounters with innocent members of the public when he is caught up in the heat of the moment and he wants to get them out of harm's way. He also has this heartfelt relationship with his deaf foster father and looks to catch the attention of a waitress called Debora (Lily James). He does have some tense moments with Doc reminding him who he works for, to which Baby replies with a reference to Monsters, Inc. (wow, an R-rated film quoting Disney...to witty effect it has to be said). I can relate to Baby in some ways, mainly because like him I spend too much time listening to my iPod. The other performances are good too, particularly Jon Hamm. Long gone are the days of suave, sophisticated Don Draper.
By the way, there is sadly no Cornetto in this film.


1. The Death of Stalin

"In Soviet Russia, comedy satires you..."
Sorry to the other fourteen films on this list. You were good – some were even great – but you weren’t this. Any complaints, you know where I am.
1953, leader of the Soviet Union Joseph Stalin is dead following a stroke and the regime has descended into chaos. Who is to take control and who has a say in this?
  • His son Vasily (Rupert Friend)
  • His daughter Svetlana (Andrea Riseborough)
  • His deputy Georgy Malenkov (Jeffrey Tambor)
  • Chief of security and NKVD (Soviet secret police) Lavrentiy Beria (Simon Russell Beale)
  • Politician Nikita Khrushchev (Steve Buscemi)
  • Foreign Secretary Vyacheslav Molotov (Michael Palin)
  • War hero Marshal Georgy Zhukov (Jason Isaacs)
"Loosely based on the true story", The Death of Stalin was originally a French graphic novel by Fabien Nury and Thierry Robins. It has been adapted for the screen by Armando Iannucci, the mastermind behind the character of Alan Partridge, Veep and, of course, The Thick of It. And that is essentially what this is, albeit in the Kremlin rather than Downing Street or the White House. Alongside Iannucci to help adapt this are The Thick of It’s co-writer Ian Martin, Peter Fellows and comedian David Schneider. Even though it is set in 1953, it is very much with the times. As Iannucci himself said:
  • “It was made in the spirit of “My God, this happened!” and it’s now released in the spirit of “God help us, please don’t let this happen again!””
There is the right mixture of humour and darkness to the film. You have the same childish and inventive insults, awkward moments of silence and people running around like headless chickens from The Thick of It. Everyone has to do the right thing – they are terrified of a wrong decision or action –  and every motion needs to be carried unanimously. The comedy starts early on. A Radio Moscow producer (Paddy Considine) is commanded to provide a recording of that night’s performance for Stalin, but it does not exist. So he locks the doors, keeps the orchestra on stage, brides the pianist to stay, drags in people off the streets and has to find another conductor – “This is just a musical emergency.” But at the same time as this going on, there are people getting thrown into prison, mass shootings, child abuse, torture, etc. The comedy does not undermine the seriousness and honesty of what actually happened. It is as much a tragedy as it is a comedy.
One of my biggest gripes sometimes in films is actors putting on fake accents, thinking that it is easy to sound like a foreigner. Some of the worst Russian accents ever in films – Arnold Schwarzenegger in Red Heat, Harrison Ford in K-19: The Widowmaker, Bob Hoskins in Enemy at the Gates (playing Nikita Khrushchev) and, of course, Sean Connery in The Hunt for Red October. Here though, the cast are not doing fake Russian accents; everyone, even the extras, is using their own voices. Joseph Stalin (Adrian McLoughlin) and Anastas Mikoyan (Paul Whitehouse) sound from Hackney; Nikita Khrushchev from Brooklyn (Steve Buscemi must have been relieved that he did not have to do a Russian accent); Georgy Malenkov from San Francisco and General Zhukov sounds like a relative of Sean Bean’s from Yorkshire.
As for performances, Simon Russell Beale was magnificent as Beria, the man in charge of security and deciding goes on the death lists or to the gulags. This is one of his first major film performances; he is mostly known for cameos in film/TV and appearing on stage. Steve Buscemi is great as Khrushchev; he [Buscemi] is the complete opposite of Russell Beale and and Khrushchev the complete opposite of Beria. And stuck in the middle of them is Jeffrey Tambor as Malenkov, who has no idea what is going on and thinks that image is a greater concern. It is great to see Michael Palin doing a film once again, his first proper appearance in what feels like ages, adding shades of Life of Brian when giving a speech to the committee. And without doubt Jason Isaacs gives the best performance as the no-nonsense, decorated war hero. And finally on this blog I have a genuine reason to carry on the great tradition of Wittertainment and say the immortal words: “Jason Isaacs, hello!” I mentioned the voice before, he said that the “bluntest” people he has ever met are all from Yorkshire and Brian Glover (the PE teacher from Kes) was an inspiration.
Back in September the Russian Ministry of Culture considered banning the film; it could, allegedly, be part of a “western plot to destabilise Russia by causing rifts in society”. And according to Jason Isaacs, it hit a bit too close to home for former Prime Minister David Cameron; apparently the film is “exactly like what was going on in Downing Street”...And before you all get any ideas, this was made pre-Brexit.
When I saw the first trailers, my initial reaction was: “It’s a Russian version of The Thick of It. That’s good enough for me.” And it did not disappoint. Now, what is the Russian for “omnishambles”?

Tuesday, December 26, 2017

My top 15 films of 2017: 10-6

Last time, we had numbers 15 to 11 of the best of 2017. Just a quick recap:

15. A Ghost Story
14. Logan
13. The LEGO Batman Movie
12. Free Fire
11. Battle of the Sexes

Now here are numbers 10 to 6...


10. Get Out

Ah, here we go. Normal service has been resumed. Our horror film of the year. The directorial debut from Jordan Peele, what many have been calling a cross between Guess Who's Coming To Dinner and The Stepford Wives.
Chris Washington (Daniel Kaluuya) is travelling upstate with his girlfriend Rose Armitage (Allison Williams) to meet her parents for the first time in their five-month-long relationship. However, he is somewhat uneasy as to how they will react to him, considering that they are white and he is black. Things look to be going well, but then Chris starts to notice some strange goings-on and the Armitages' true colours are revealed.
Jordan Peele is most well known as a sketch comedian, so would not be the obvious choice to make a horror film. However, for a directorial debut, he hits it out of the park. It is, in his own words, “an expression of [his] truth, [his] experience, the experiences of a lot of black people and minorities”; he also described it as “a documentary”. This is certainly one of the most memorable directorial debuts in recent memory. In his words it is a "social-thriller" and other have seen it as a satire of white middle-class liberalism and post-racial America. He did highlight the influences of Ira Levin, the original writer of The Stepford Wives (as mentioned previously) and also Rosemary's Baby; there is also a touch of Night of the Living Dead with the rarity of being a horror film with a black protagonist.
Early on you have Rose trying to put Chris' mind at ease, telling him that her father, neurosurgeon Dean (Bradley Whitfield), would have voted for a third term for Obama; he later repeats that to him. The first sign that there is something strange going on is the incident when Rose hits a deer on the road and the police officer asks for Chris’ driving licence, even though he was not driving. That subtext leads to what is to come. Then there is arriving at the house, when Chris is introduced to the housekeeper and groundskeeper who are both black and smile at him in such a robotic way. Peele is dropping subtle hints here, by the way. He then bumps into them in the middle of the night; the groundskeeper is going for a run in his work overalls. Ok, that is especially weird because he is running straight at the camera. And then there is Rose's mother Missy (Catherine Keener), a psychiatrist who says she can cure Chris' smoking habit through hypnosis, involving stirring a cup of tea.
Chris is an intelligent character; he can detect that something is not right and the way that everyone is embracing him and the fact he is black makes him feel uneasy. He tries to tell his girlfriend, but she is effectively telling him that it will all be over soon. Kaluuya is fantastic in his first lead performance of his promising career. You have complete empathy for him. This is also an amusing supporting performance from LilRey Howery who plays the conspiracy theorist best friend.
This was a very successful film, with a budget of about $4.5 million and grossing over $250 million. It remained in the US Box Office charts for two months after its opening release. Despite this amazing success, I must address one thing – the Golden Globes. Who at the Hollywood Foreign Press Association thought that this horror, socio-political thriller was a comedy? What exactly are they laughing at?
And it was announced earlier this month that Jordan Peele is rebooting The Twilight Zone. Seems appropriate…


9. Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2

I am Groot? I am Groot? I am Groot. That means: "Were there any doubts about whether this film would be a hit? Were there any feelings or fears of second album syndrome? Thankfully no."
The Guardians of the Galaxy - Peter Quill/Star-Lord (Chris Pratt), Gamora (Zoe Saldana), Drax (Dave Bautista), Rocket the raccoon (the voice of Bradley Cooper) and Baby Groot (Vin Diesel) - have had an encounter with a race known as The Sovereign and are not on the best of terms with them. However, they manage to escape their attack with help from 'The Living Planet' - Ego (Kurt Russell), who claims to be Peter's estranged father.
I think that not many people expected the first Guardians of the Galaxy to be a success; they were expecting it to be a flop. It was certainly a gamble from Marvel Studios, especially after the success of Avengers Assemble. It was not really sold to us in the same way. But a large part of its success was down to director James Gunn and his quirky mind. We loved the action, the snappy/witty dialogue, the funky soundtrack, the surprise; we loved the whole thing. Now though, we do have expectations for Vol. 2 and, fortunately, we just manage to reach them. Though it is not as much of a knockout as the first film, it makes a great second edition.
Once again Chris Pratt is entertaining as Quill. It is now hard to imagine anyone else in this role. I also thought Dave Bautista has certainly been given more funny moments; Drax has certainly learned to embrace a sense of humour whilst still having those same deadpan qualities as last time. With these films’ retro feel to them, it seemed only appropriate to have Kurt Russell appear in one way or another. Other notable appearances include once again Michael Rooker, who makes a very funny joke referencing Mary Poppins, and Karen Gillan, and also new additions such as Pom Klementieff, Elizabeth Debicki, Tommy Flanagan and even Sylvester Stallone. This does seem to be a franchise you could have a lot of fun making. It is such shame though that James Gunn did not get to fulfil his dream of having a cameo appearance from David Bowie. That would have been the most perfect thing ever.
The main theme of this film is family and different family relationships. All this time, Peter has never known who his real father is, telling people it was David Hasselhoff. And then he meets Ego and is initially not convinced by him, particularly about how Ego left his mother to die. Ego left Peter to be raised by Yondu, but Yondu keeps him because he was "skinny" and "good for thievin'". Ego eventually wins Peter over, but it all seems too good to be true. In a heated exchange between him and Gamora he believes that he has finally found his family, but she thought he already had, meaning the others Guardians. The conflicted relationship between Gamora and Nebula is also part of this theme – they are family so have some affection, but hate each other at the same time.
I mentioned how much we loved the first film’s soundtrack. Here is a taste of what there is this time:
  • Mr Blue Sky – ELO
  • The Chain – Fleetwood Mac
  • My Sweet Lord – George Harrison
  • Come A Little Bit Closer – Jay & The Americans
  • Wham Bam Shang-a-Lang – Silver
  • Surrender – Cheap Trick
  • Father and Son – Cat Stevens
By the way, I might have said this already but I have to again; Baby Groot is adorably awesome. The scene where he has to retrieve the prototype fin; that was one of the funniest moments of the year. In the words of Taserface (he he he!!!), "It's too adorable to kill".


8. War for the Planet of the Apes
 
"Ape-ocalypse Now!!!"
When I reviewed Dawn of the Planet of the Apes, I remember saying that there was still some way to go before we had come full circle in this franchise. We might be closer than I originally thought. This was a great follow-up and it was announced back in October 2016 there would be another film to follow.
Two years after the events of Dawn, Caesar (Andy Serkis) and the other apes have remained in the woods but they are now engaged in conflict with a human military faction known as Alpha-Omega, led by a man simply known as "The Colonel" (Woody Harrelson). Caesar is being haunted by visions of his past and following a devastating loss, he decides to avenge his kind. However, he learns that the Colonel has been imprisoning apes and forcing them to construct a wall.
This is a very dark film; dark as in subject matter and themes. Conquest of the Planet of the Apes was the darkest and most controversial of the original series as it dealt with imprisonment, slavery, cruelty to animals, rebellion, violence and revenge – ultimately the apes rising up and overthrowing humanity. By that point, however, the original series was starting to run out of steam; fans had just glossed over Escape from the Planet of the Apes. War deals with difficult subject matter too, in a serious yet respectful way. Like Dawn this film is helmed together well by director Matt Reeves and he could have easily made just an everyday, run-of-the-mill war film - that is the title of this film after all. However, this is a war of attrition, of the mind and soul. This is a franchise that has flirted with other genres beyond sci-fi in the past; Beneath the Planet of the Apes had elements of horror to it. Reeves has noted the influence of many great war films from the past, including The Great Escape, Patton, Lawrence of Arabia and The Bridge on the River Kwai. Also, as previously mentioned in Logan, War has a wall...Was that the common theme for movie in 2017 to try to fit in?
Like Rise and Dawn, the best thing about this film is the lead performance from Andy Serkis and the performance-capture work from him. In Dawn, he introduced a way for the apes to communicate with each other - a form of sign language. That continues in this film and his diction has vastly advanced, but now it feels as if there is greater attention on his facial features and expressions, making him more three-dimensional. These range from compassion to fury. Everybody has noted one quote in particular from the Colonel when he is up-close to Caesar for the first time: "Look at your eyes. Almost human." And, as mentioned before, he is living with the consequences of the events that concluded Dawn. In some ways you look at Caesar and you see Andy Serkis. Sadly, even though he is still just “acting in another guise”, he will once again be overlooked by the Academy Awards, as he was for playing Gollum.
As for Woody Harrelson, do not go into the film expecting a rehash of his character Tallahassee from Zombieland. Think of him more like Colonel Kurtz from Apocalypse Now...but unlike Marlon Brando he is not overweight and he has bothered to read the script. His character is dangerous. There is also some comic relief provided by the character of Bad Ape (Steve Zahn), something that has not been present in the other films, and Karin Konoval is great the lovable orangutan Maurice.
In this rebooted series, there have been numerous nods and references to the original Planet of the Apes. That continues in this film particularly with an influence for the scarecrows in the original and the names of two characters, one of whom Caesar picks up on the trail. If you do not want spoilers, avoid the cast list on IMDB, but all I shall say is my eyes widened when they mentioned this character’s name near the end. And no offence to the originals but the motion-capture apes look more realistic and better than simply applying prosthetics to actors. I am not for one minute suggesting that the originals are rubbish as some critics have implied. It is still a great movie today and it seems too easy to sneer at the past. These reboots have kept its legacy going. If you are going to trash any Planet of the Apes film, make it the Tim Burton “reimagining”.


7. Dunkirk

You were expecting this to be number 1, weren't you? Normally it would be, considering how much admiration I have for Christopher Nolan. Well, usually the top two films in my lists are the hardest to separate, but this year so many films could have been number 1, highlighting what a great year it has been. A lot of people called this one of the definitive war films and Peter Travers of Rolling Stone called it "the first major Oscar contender of the year".
This film is based on the Dunkirk evacuation which took place during the Second World War. In May 1940, British and French forces attempted to rescue 400,000 Allied troops surrounded by the German Army from Northern France and cross the English Channel. This involved using any vessel that could be found, both naval and civilian.
This film has a non-linear narrative, following three major threads which last different periods of time. "The Mole" begins on land and covers a week, focusing on soldiers Tommy (Fionn Whitehead), Gibson (Aneurin Barnard) and Alex (Harry Styles), as well as the two commanders-in-chief coordinating the evacuation - Colonel Winnant (James D'Arcy) and Commander Bolton (Sir Kenneth Branagh). "The Sea" covers one day, showing the Navy commandeering private boats to aid in the evacuation. One of those is the Moonstone owned by Mr. Dawson (Mark Rylance) and he, along with his son Peter and their hand George, find a soldier (Cillian Murphy) sitting on a wrecked ship, suffering from shell-shock. "The Air" covers one hour and looks at how a trio of Spitfire pilots, including Collins (Jack Lowden) and Farrier (Tom Hardy), provide air support to the evacuees.
Christopher Nolan did say that he wanted to tell the story of Dunkirk because it never had been done before on film; there was a film with the same name from 1958 starring Richard Attenborough and some made prior to that...and Atonement and Their Finest (if they count). But those films are now probably secondary to Nolan's Dunkirk. It is the definitive film about the evacuation of Dunkirk in the same way that the definitive film about D-Day is Saving Private Ryan. Some of Nolan's inspiration for this film came from 1930’s All Quiet on the Western Front; in his words “war dehumanises” and its “intensity and horror have never been bettered”. A number of other war films are influences and also Alien, Speed and Unstoppable; these three inspired the accumulation of tension.
The action really is edge-of-your-seat, quite similar is some respects to Saving Private Ryan although that film had a lot more gore in it. There has never really been much of that in Nolan’s films, not even The Dark Knight trilogy. There are no limbs flying in all directions as there were in Spielberg’s masterpiece or blood gushing everywhere, but there are enough explosions to shake you into life if you dare think about nodding off. The likelihood of characters drowning creates enough tension itself. It is not just at ground level that the action is intense. The dogfights, in the style of Battle of Britain, offer an immersive first-person point of view that you could not possibly get from a virtual reality device or a video game. All of the action works in perfect tandem with the score from Hans Zimmer and, once again in a Nolan film, it was all real; little to no computer input.
This being a Christopher Nolan film, there is always going to be an ensemble cast and a largely British one for this film too. You have the regulars who have appeared numerous times for him before in Cillian Murphy and Tom Hardy; there is even a cheeky cameo from another one (I will not give it away who, but listen very carefully to one radio message that Hardy has). Personally Kenneth Brannagh gave the best performance, hitting the correct tone at the appropriate moments and getting the stand-out lines. I must admit that I had concerns and raised eyebrows at the casting of Harry Styles and felt that some people would go and see this film for all the wrong reasons because he was in it. Mind you, his performance was decent enough, with Nolan comparing it to when he casted Heath Ledger  in The Dark Knight – the fact people were underestimating him too. Whether or not Styles continues with a career in acting is a possibility, although I bet a number of One Direction fans now believe that he was actually at Dunkirk. The other notable first-timer Fionn Whitehead is the main character for all the action to revolve around. He is the connection for the audience; he faces life or death choices which displays a sign of empathy from the audience.
Another reason to admire Christopher Nolan is his love of celluloid; this film was available in 35mm. It would have been interesting to see it like that and compare it to how it was in IMAX. I was somewhat surprised at the length of the film. It is just over 100 minutes long, making it Nolan's second shortest film after Following, even shorter than Memento. He believes that Dunkirk is perhaps more of a survival film than a war film, about the human spirit and will to survive. What ever it was, it served as a fitting tribute to those who gave their lives to save the world.


6. Detroit

A commemoration of the 50th anniversary of one of America's largest race riots.
Detroit is set to the backdrop of the 12th Street Riot that took place in the city in July 1967, after civil unrest and rioting cause a curfew to be put into effect and the National Guard to patrol the streets. At the centre of the action is the Algiers Motel, where three young African American men were murdered and nine others beaten. With his own moral stance is white Detroit PD Officer Phillip Krauss (Will Poulter), but there to diffuse the situation is black part-time security guard Melvin Dismukes (John Boyega).
I know this sounds obvious, but a subject such as this needs to be in the hand of filmmakers who treat it with respect and are open-minded (not one-sided). Fortunately we have the right duo behind this film, two Academy Award winners - writer/journalist Mark Boal and director Kathryn Bigelow. As I am sure you all know, in recent years Bigelow made history by becoming the first woman to win the Oscar for Best Director for The Hurt Locker and was then compared to Leni Riefenstahl by journalist Naomi Wolf for "glorifying torture" in Zero Dark Thirty. Much like that film, Bigelow and Boal have taken a true story and fictionalised elements of it.
Like Zero Dark Thirty, this film has people being tortured and beaten to get information out of them, but unlike that film you cannot misinterpret it in Detroit. The film is harrowing and intense. You might wince and have to look away at times. Part of that is down to Barry Ackroyd’s cinematography and the sound editing. The police play this interrogation or ‘death game’ with the hostages; they are not interested in the truth, what actually happened to call them to the motel (they believe it was a sniper), but instead getting a quick result. The ‘game’ starts as disbelieving – are they actually doing this?!? – and then it gets to the stage where you think something is going to go horribly wrong…and it does.
As for performances, there has been much praise for John Boyega as Melvin Dismukes. He is does not want any violence to break out, so acts as the peacemaker almost between the police, the National Guard and the hostages. Those aware of the true story will know what happens to Dismukes following the incident and in these situations Boyega is brilliant. As for Will Poulter, I remember seeing him in a few CBBC shows years and years ago and it is hard to imagine that this is the same guy. He has built a fairly good résumé for himself with his performances in Son of Rambow, The Maze Runner, The Revenant and now this. He is the fictionalised, racist cop whose actions were inspired by a real officer and he is scarily good. When we first see him, he is taking pot-shots at looters in a decimated neighbourhood. His alleged reason; he is keeping the peace, yet compares it to Vietnam. And then there is Algee Smith playing Larry ‘Cleveland’ Reed, the lead singer of the Dramatics. He starts as cocky and brash, but that façade vanishes at the motel and we see innocence from him. What started with their performance at the Fox theatre being abandoned leads to him seeking safe haven at the motel to escape further riots, before the police arrive.
It also begins with this animation/history lesson based on paintings by Jacob Lawrence about the "great migration" of African Americans from the rural south to the industrialised north, leading to the migrants living in ghetto-like slums and being policed by the white man. It comes across as innocent and almost out of place, a contrast to the rest of the film’s dark nature. However, it is very successful in its achievements and intentions. The moral of it: equality is "an illusion", change is "inevitable". I mentioned Barry Ackroyd before; I liked the vintage look of some moments, which well complimented the occasional archive material.
Please do not let the tough subject matter or themes put you off…or the fact it is directed by Kathryn Bigelow (seriously, most of my friends are not fans of hers). It is a powerful film and like most of her films it is meant to be taken seriously…unlike Point Break.

Next time: number 5 to number 1